On Wed, 19-Nov-2003 at 05:03PM +0000, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

|> For the record, ISOdate *is* giving the right answer, a POSIXct object.
|> 
|> The problem is in printing, where there was a simple coding bug: is_year 
|> was applied to the POSIX `year' which is year-1900.

I can't see why it doesn't effect dates before 2nd March.



-- 
Patrick Connolly
HortResearch
Mt Albert
Auckland
New Zealand 
Ph: +64-9 815 4200 x 7188
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~
I have the world`s largest collection of seashells. I keep it on all
the beaches of the world ... Perhaps you`ve seen it.  ---Steven Wright 
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help

Reply via email to