"Pascal A. Niklaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - In my experience even *very* basic questions *relating to the R > language* do get answered on r-help. I'm impressed by how much time > some members of the R core team spend answering relatively basic > questions, and by how elaborate their answers generally are. So I > cannot see much need for a new R mailing list. There are these > excellent mailing list archives, so why "fragment" this list?
To follow up, well-thought through basic questions do get answered; in particular, they can be useful for those of us writing packages, documentation, etc. I have a sense that it is the quality of the question (details of what is intended to do, or not known, signs of using other sources of materials which folks have spent years on, no signs that this is a "do my work for me" question) rather than the level of the question, that is an issue. best, -tony -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ Biomedical and Health Informatics University of Washington Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center UW (Tu/Th/F): 206-616-7630 FAX=206-543-3461 | Voicemail is unreliable FHCRC (M/W): 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | use Email CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachme...{{dropped}} ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
