An alternative to attach is with:
x <- with( theta, c(one,two,three) )
---
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:32:0 +0800
From: li dongfeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [R] be careful: using attach in R functions
Hi there,
I have just found that the ``attach'' function
can get you into trouble when called many times.
For example, you have a simulation routine called ``f()'',
in which you used ``attach'' and no corresponding ``detach''.
Then you call this function many times. You will find that
the system performance get slower and slower,
because you are making the R search path longer and longer.
So be careful when you use attach in a function!
Below is a demonstration of this performance loss,
you will see a linear growth in CPU time usage.
Adding a ``detach()'' call at the end of ``f''
will get rid of this problem.
###############################
f <- function(){
theta <- list(one=2.0, two=0.3, three=0.4)
attach(theta)
x <- c(one, two, three)
sample(x, 1)
}
test <- function(n=400){
timeu <- numeric(n)
for(i in seq(n)){
timeu[i] <-
system.time({
resi <- f()
})[3]
}
plot(timeu)
}
test()
##############################
����������������Li Dongfeng
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
��������������������2004-02-24
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
