Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, A.J. Rossini wrote: > >> Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > A more elegant solution would use the new R condition mechanism and allow >> > assertion failures to be caught independently of errors. >> >> A pointer to this would be appreciated. >> > > help(tryCatch)
Slick. very slick if it works as well as I hope it does. What I was looking for :-). best, -tony -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ Biomedical and Health Informatics University of Washington Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center UW (Tu/Th/F): 206-616-7630 FAX=206-543-3461 | Voicemail is unreliable FHCRC (M/W): 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | use Email CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachme...{{dropped}} ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
