On 18-Apr-04 Peter Dalgaard wrote: > However, it begs the question whether it wouldn't have been better > to design the RSS into the lm class rather than computing it from > residuals in summary.lm and anova.lm and predict.lm and...
Well, something like this though lay under my original query. The 'lm' fit, as opposed to 'glm' where for some models it may be necessary to work from individual observations, is basically least-squares, so it could be done once and for all as Peter suggests. Hence I wondered if this had somehow already been implemented (not necessarily in the 'lm' function itself). It does seem more logical to "design the RSS into the lm class". Best wishes, Ted. -------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972 Date: 18-Apr-04 Time: 13:06:48 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------ ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
