On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:41:18 +0200, Tamas Papp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>You are probably right in saying that they _could_ have done better,
>but I would not use "should" in this context.  AFAIK the package is
>free (as in beer) software, which means that you are not paying for
>it.  The maintainers probably do not need a Linux version (yet), so it
>was not easy to use it under Linux.  Feel free to contribute.  

Yes, indeed!  

Duncan Murdoch

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to