WHY THIS FUNCTIONAL FORM?


If this were my problem, I would first want to know why we needed this particular functional form and why (b*var3+a) and (b*var4+a) had to be between 0 and 1. When I see things like this, my first impulse is that these may only be approximations to something else, and then I would seek a different approximation that might plausibly be better and was not subject to the constraints.

CREATIVE PLOTS?

What kind(s) of random model(s) are you considering? What kinds of plots have you made? Before I did heavy modeling, I'd compute correlations and make plots designed to explore the chosen relationship from different perspectives, e.g., using lattice graphics, contour and perspective / wireframe plots, etc. Such plots might suggest alternative functional forms.

PENALIZING "nlme"?

If I still needed to fit the model you suggested, I might first rewrite it something like the following:

nlme(log(response)~z+y*log(var1)+x*log(var2)+log01(b*var3+a, xlim)-x*log01(b*var4+a, xlim), ...

where log01 is something like the following [***UNTESTED***]:

log01 <- function(zz, xlim){
# log(zz) if xlim[1]<zz<xlim[2]
# else something that goes balistic othis range
# with rate controlled by xlim[3]; # log01 must be continuous and monotonic. zz.sm <- (zz<xlim[1])
zz.lg <- (zz>xlim[2])
log.zz <- rep(NA, length(zz))
log.zz[zz.sm] <- (log(xlim[1])-
(exp(xlim[3]*(xlim[1]-zz[zz.sm]))-1))
log.zz[zz.lg] <- (log(xlim[2])+
(exp(xlim[3]*(zz[zz.lg]-xlim[2]))-1))
zz.gd <- !(zz.sm | zz.lg)
log.zz[zz.gd] <- log(zz[zz.gd])
log.zz
}


I would first run it with xlim something like c(0.1, 0.9, 0.01). I'd then look at the cases for which I got log01 outside xlim[1:2] and (gradually) adjust xlim to get something close to what I wanted, e.g., like c(0.01, 0.99, 100). If this didn't work well, I might also try to modify log01 so it was also differentiable in zz.

FITTING SUBSETS?

I might also try fitting the same model to different subsets of the data, perhaps suggested by the most plausible random effects models, then use the parameter estimates as data for a second stage analysis, following Box and Hunter, "A Useful Method for Model Building" paper; you should be able to find a complete citation on the web.

MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO (MCMC)?

I think the "gold standard" for this type of problem is MCMC. There is software available for that, but I haven't used it and therefore can't comment. However, before I got to that point, I would make lots of plots and try to several alternative, simpler models to convince myself that this was both appropriate and necessary.

     hope this helps.  spencer graves

Hwange Project wrote:

Dear r-helpers,
does anyone knows how to constrain the value of parameters in a non-linear
mixed model:
I've got something like that:
nlme(log(response)~z+y*log(var1)+x*log(var2)+log((b*var3+a)/(b*var4+a)^x)
where 0<x<1, a<1 and (b*(var3 or var4: range of values similar)+a) between 0
and 1.
or even better if you know how to linearize it !!

and another one :
What means ?
Error in chol((value + t(value))/2) : the leading minor of order 1 is not
positive definite
(my statical books do not go far enough in the detail.
It must be about the Cholesky something if I remember well what I read
long-time ago).

I'm sorry to bother you with this kind of things, but I'm in a remote place
(~18�45'S,26�45'E)
(even if e-mails are working at the incredible speed of 4.8 kbits/sec...)
without a lot of statistical or computer ressources. Thanks,
simon

---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Chamaill�
Hwange Project
CIRAD-CNRS
Hwange Main Camp Research
P. Bag 5776, Dete
(+00 263) 18-647
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html



______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to