Actually .... I was not clear .... I will rephrase
I read what is posted below in the help file already ... I read them often.
****I want to keep the row references****
My question is _when you keep the row names_, why is the command write.table implemented in such a way that the column names are left shifted starting in the column where the row names are written? Does it not make sense to have the column names where they are supposed to be, starting in the second column, if the column names _are_ included in the first column?Is there a feature in this that I am missing; why is it implemented in this way?
Peter
At 04:00 PM 6/22/2004, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
From the details of ?write.table (and in the Data Import/Export manual and in MASS4 ...)
Normally there is no column name for a column of row names. If 'col.names=NA' a blank column name is added. This can be used to write CSV files for input to spreadsheets.
What can we possible do to make this more obvious?
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Peter Wilkinson wrote:
> When using the write.table (say for a tab delimited file) command on a
> matrix with Row and Columns, the column headers are always being left
> shifted into the column where the row numbers are being placed. One can see
> this when you open up the tab delimited file in excel.
>
> Is there a better command for this, or is this supposed to be a 'feature'.
It is a genuinely useful feature, fully documented.
-- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
