On 7/16/04 11:51 AM, "Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't want to use loop because a) the overhead and b) I'm comparing it with > another technique that doesn't require a loop, and programming the simulation > without the loop gave me an insight into the solution of the problem > Is there a way of doing this without using a loop? > > s<-1:n > v<-sample(s, replace=TRUE) > w<-v:(v+k) > > Doesn't work
Why doesn't it work, ie if you replace w<-v:(v+k) by w<-(v*k):((v+1)*k)? ingmar ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
