Hi Bert,

Regarding the sensitivity in the choice of the random-effects distribution, I know that usually estimates of the fixed-effects (and their std.errors) do not have serious problems, even if you assume normality where in fact you have log-normality. However, you do have a problem in the EB estimates of the random-effects.

More info could be found in:

G. Verbeke and E. Lesaffre (1996). A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population, JASA, 91, 217-221.

W. Ghidey, E. Lesaffre and P. Eilers (2004). Smooth random-effects distribution in linear mixed model, Biometrics, 60, 945-953.
(to appear in December)


Best,
Dimitris

----
Dimitris Rizopoulos
Ph.D. Student
Biostatistical Centre
School of Public Health
Catholic University of Leuven

Address: Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, Belgium
Tel: +32/16/396887
Fax: +32/16/337015
Web: http://www.med.kuleuven.ac.be/biostat/
    http://www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~m0390867/dimitris.htm


----- Original Message ----- From: "Berton Gunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Dimitris Rizopoulos'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Angelo Secchi'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 5:42 PM
Subject: RE: [R] Robust regression with groups



Angelo and Folks:

Beware! It is not at all clear what you mean by "robust" regression. The
sandwich estimator is often said to be "robust" to model misspecification in
the sense that it converges to the correct covariance matrix whether or not
the correlation structure in the GEE has been correctly specified (as
Dmitris implied). Is this what you mean? Mixed effect models are often said
to be "robust" in the sense that individual group "estimators" (blups) are
shrunk toward the overall fixed effect estimates. Is this what you mean?


In other applications, "robustness" can mean insensitivity to distributional
assumptions. Mixed effects models for continupus responses commonly assume
normality (as the estimates solve likelihood equations), as do GLMM's for
the random effects. I know of no definitive work that has examined
sensitivity of estimates (or inferences, which are, at best, asymptotic
anyway) to those assumptions. (in the simple independent errors case, it is
usually the case that estimates are not at all sensitive). However, I am a
novice here, so others may be able to illuminate the issue more.


Finally, "robustness" is often used to mean "outlier resistance." Here the
situation is yet murkier. Do you mean resistance to individual "outlying"
observations within a subject or resistance to outlying subjects? Shrinkage
should help with both, but, again, I know of no definitive work, especially
regarding resistance to individual extreme values. Given the sensitivity of
covariance estimates to heavy tails and the consequent inferential
inefficiency, this presumably could be a problem. Finding methods that could
deal with this may be nearly impossible, as you are adding yet another layer
of nonlinear estimation (that of determining optimal case weights/parameters
for mixture contamination models/or whatever...) to the problem; it is easy
to come up with examples where the data are inherently ambiguous and
parameter estimates for resistant case weights and the model would trade off
with each other depending on starting values. That is, too many nonlinear
parameters are being estimated and the model estimates are therefore
unstable.


Again, I am happy to leave more definitive resolution and correction of any
errors in my comments to the experts, but, at the least, I think you need to
think more and communicate more clearly about what you mean by "robust."


Cheers,

-- Bert Gunter
Genentech Non-Clinical Statistics
South San Francisco, CA

"The business of the statistician is to catalyze the scientific learning
process." - George E. P. Box




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dimitris Rizopoulos
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 7:08 AM
To: Angelo Secchi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] Robust regression with groups

Hi Angelo,

There are two possible options (at least to my knowledge):

1. to use a random-effects model, either using `lme' (packages: nlme,
lme4) if you have normal data or `glmmPQL' (package: MASS) or `GLMM'
(package: lme4) or `glmmML' (package:glmmML) if you cannot use the
normal distribution.


2. to use a gee model with a robust (sandwich) std.error estimation.
See at `gee' (package: gee) and `geese' (package: geepack).


I hope this helps.

Best,
Dimitris

----
Dimitris Rizopoulos
Ph.D. Student
Biostatistical Centre
School of Public Health
Catholic University of Leuven

Address: Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, Belgium
Tel: +32/16/396887
Fax: +32/16/337015
Web: http://www.med.kuleuven.ac.be/biostat/
     http://www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~m0390867/dimitris.htm




----- Original Message ----- From: "Angelo Secchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: [R] Robust regression with groups



>
>
> Hi,
> I have data on a group of subjects in different years. I should
> assume
> that observations regarding different individuals are independent
> but
> observations for the same individual in different years are not > and
> I
> would like to have an estimated standard error (and
> variance-covariance
> matrix) taking into account this problem.
>
> More in general is there a way in R to run a (robust)regression
> having
> different groups in the observations and specifying that the
> observation
> are independent across groups but not necessarily independent > within
> groups?
>
> Thanks
> a.
>
> ______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>


______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide!
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html



______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to