Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Andrew K Helyer wrote: > > > On a SUN 280R running Solaris 9... > > Compilers? Optimization settings? 32- or 64-bit?
...and libraries. The DTU machine died a very similar death inside libsunperf when compiled for 64bit. (extract from Makeconf -- my config.site has some ATLAS stuff inside which I suspect didn't take so is probably misleading. I'm not going to do a clean build now....) BLAS_LIBS = -xlic_lib=sunperf -lsunmath CC = cc -xarch=v9b CFLAGS = -xO5 -xlibmil -dalign CPICFLAGS = -KPIC CPPFLAGS = -I/usr/local/include -I/opt/sfw/include FFLAGS = -xO5 -xlibmil -dalign FLIBS = -L/usr/local/lib -lfui -lfai -lfai2 -lfsumai -lfprodai -lfminlai -lfmaxlai -lfminvai -lfmaxvai -lfsu -lompstubs -lsunmath -lm FPICFLAGS = -PIC F77 = f95 -xarch=v9b (If it is the same thing, base-Ex.Rout.fail dies inside example(kappa) and example(svd) should segfault as well). That segfault comes from inside libsunperf and occurs only in 64bit, not 32bit, so I suspect a library bug. Following this up with Sun is somewhere on my TODO list... > > The configure and make steps completed without errors. But when I try to > > perform the make check step, I get the following: > > > > > > $ make check FORCE=FORCE > > `Makedeps' is up to date. > > running code in 'base-Ex.R' ...*** Error code 1 > > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `base-Ex.Rout' > > Current working directory /usr/local/R-2.0.0/tests/Examples > > Please take a look at the file that failed, probably > tests/Examples/base-Ex.Rout.fail. If that is not there, look for a core > dump in tests/Examples. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
