On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 09:19 +0100, Martyn Plummer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 19:47, Jonathan Baron wrote: > > On 11/09/04 20:37, Jari Oksanen wrote: > > > > > >On 9 Nov 2004, at 19:44, Jonathan Baron wrote: > > > > > >> The RPM for Fedora Core 2 seems to work just fine on Core 3. > > >> > > >> (The graphics window got smaller, but I'm sure there is a setting > > >> for that.) > > >> > > >That would be good news. I really don't know how the graphics window > > >became so big at some stage. (MacOS X is just cute here: tiny, sharp, > > >fast graphics window.) > > > > I have the opposite problem, a 1680x1050 display. > > > > >Has the options()printcmd reappeared, so that dev.print() works without > > >changing default options? > > > > I can't imagine how this would change. This is the same "old" > > RPM, not a new one. The option is there, and I don't think it > > ever disappeared. I can't test it. This is my laptop, which is > > not set up to print anything. > > My mistake. The default print command is determined at configure time. > But the RedHat RPMS are built in a sandbox that has only the minimal > configuration needed to build R. This doesn't include the lpr package so > the default print command is null. I will fix this in the next RPM > release, but right now I am upgrading to FC3.
An RPM for Fedora Core 3 should be on a CRAN mirror near you by the weekend. This fixes the printcmd bug. The X11() window is the right size for me, but it doesn't have a title bar, which is a nuisance. Martyn ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
