On 24 Nov 2004, at 10:16, Christoph Lehmann wrote:
Dear all, not really a R question but:
If I want to check for the classification accuracy of a LDA with previous PCA for dimensionality reduction by means of the LOOCV method:
Is it ok to do the PCA on the WHOLE dataset ONCE and then run the LDA with the CV option set to TRUE (runs LOOCV)
-- OR--
do I need
- to compute for each 'test-bag' (the n-1 observations) a PCA (my.princomp.1),
- then run the LDA on the test-bag scores (-> my.lda.1)
- then compute the scores of the left-out-observation using my.princomp.1 (-> my.scores.2)
- and only then use predict.lda(my.lda.1, my.scores.2) on the scores of the left-out-observation
?
I read some articles, where they choose procedure 1, but I am not sure, if this is really correct?
As far as understand your problem (assessing the predictive ability of your model), the second solution should be done: the test set is something that should be never seen by the training data. If you run your PCA on the whole set, then you will take into account your test bag while forming your training data. Keep in mind that your classifier is made up with 2 components: PCA followed by LDA. This is fine if you build your model with a given number of PC's: the procedure to get an optimal number of PC's would be similar as above but considering the (n-1) examples. A proper validation of the model can become quickly tricky: this requires a bit of computing skills and this may take longer (especially with LOO)!
Hope it helps
David
many thanks for a hint
Christoph
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
