I've not seen anyone mention that this is really a time-series problem of lagging variables, and something like

tmp <- ts.intersect(as.ts(return), lag(marketcap, -1))
tmp[,1]*tmp[,2]

is a lot more intuitive, easier to generalize and keeps the timebase information around.

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 01-Dec-04 Uwe Ligges wrote:
(Ted Harding) wrote:
[...]
Let

  N<-length(return)
  new.var <- return[2:N]*marketcap[1:(N-1)]

Ted, I aggree to all of your points, but we can simplify by negative indices (and hence circumvent your note 1): return[-1] * marketcap[-N]

Uwe Ligges

Neat footwork, Uwe! (Why didn;t I think of that? No, don't answer ... ) Ted.


-------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 [NB: New number!] Date: 01-Dec-04 Time: 08:00:22 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html



-- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to