On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Romain Francois wrote: ... > >It seems that the next improvement to the R Graph Gallery is > >categorization of the graphics, that way each graph will be easier to > >find. That step should be done *carefully* if we want to avoid the > >opposite side-effect : graph not reachable through the categories. ... > > I would humbly suggest that the underlying data (graphs/categories/etc) be > organized in such a way as to allow multiple categorizations. That way > there could be any number of different categorizations applied to the same > graphs, as one overall categorization may reflect only one particular > viewpoint.
Heartily seconded! > This way the chosen categories (however you decide to choose) would not be > set in stone, but would be intimatly flexible. > > Also a single graph should be allowed to occur under multiple categories > of a particular categorization. ... An example of non-hierarchical categorization is the keyword-categorization method used by Wikis. See http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?CategoryCategory for an example. If a graph could be in multiple categories (3d, social science, color, publication ready/published) it could be identified with multiple keywords and dynamically listed in each of the sub-galleries. Dave -- Dr. David Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)684-7900w [EMAIL PROTECTED] (804)642-0662h http://maplepark.com/~drf5n/ ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
