i am aware of this but i don't know why.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:31:25 +0200
Emmanuel Tillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dear R users
> 
> I encounter a problem when i perform a generalized linear mixed model (binary 
> data) with the lmer function (package lme4)
> with R 2.1.0 on windows XP and the latest version of package "lme4" (0.96-1) 
> and "matrix" (0.96-2)
> both options "PQL" and "Laplace" for the method argument in lmer function 
> gave me the same results (random and fixed effects estimates, standard error 
> and p.values). However, Loglikelihood and deviance are different.
> 
> here is an example reproduced with the bacteria data set available in the 
> MASS package:
> 
> library(lme4)
> library(MASS)
> 
> data(bacteria)
> bacteria$week2 <- as.factor(ifelse(bacteria$week <=2, 0, 1))
> model.PQL <- lmer(y ~ trt + week2 + (1 | ID), family = binomial, data  = 
> bacteria, method ="PQL")
> model.Laplace <- lmer(y ~ trt + week2 + (1 | ID), family = binomial, data = 
> bacteria, method ="Laplace")
> 
> model.PQL
> model.Laplace
> 
> > model.PQL
> Generalized linear mixed model fit using PQL 
> Formula: y ~ trt + week2 + (1 | ID) 
>    Data: bacteria 
>  Family: binomial(logit link)
>      AIC      BIC   logLik deviance
>  152.443 138.8685 -80.2215  160.443
> Random effects:
>      Groups        Name    Variance    Std.Dev. 
>          ID (Intercept)      3.2721      1.8089 
> # of obs: 220, groups: ID, 50
> 
> Estimated scale (compare to 1)  0.7800484 
> 
> Fixed effects:
>             Estimate Std. Error z value  Pr(>|z|)    
> (Intercept)  3.41227    0.65884  5.1792 2.228e-07 ***
> trtdrug     -1.24743    0.81841 -1.5242 0.1274555    
> trtdrug+    -0.75440    0.82009 -0.9199 0.3576229    
> week21      -1.60737    0.45527 -3.5306 0.0004146 ***
> ---
> Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 
> 
> > model.Laplace
> Generalized linear mixed model fit using Laplace 
> Formula: y ~ trt + week2 + (1 | ID) 
>    Data: bacteria 
>  Family: binomial(logit link)
>       AIC      BIC    logLik deviance
>  304.9488 291.3743 -156.4744 312.9488
> Random effects:
>      Groups        Name    Variance    Std.Dev. 
>          ID (Intercept)      3.2721      1.8089 
> # of obs: 220, groups: ID, 50
> 
> Estimated scale (compare to 1)  0.7800484 
> 
> Fixed effects:
>             Estimate Std. Error z value  Pr(>|z|)    
> (Intercept)  3.41227    0.65884  5.1792 2.228e-07 ***
> trtdrug     -1.24743    0.81841 -1.5242 0.1274555    
> trtdrug+    -0.75440    0.82009 -0.9199 0.3576229    
> week21      -1.60737    0.45527 -3.5306 0.0004146 ***
> ---
> Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 
> 
> is anybody else aware of this? or did I forget something important ?
> 
> Many thanks for your help.
> 
> -- 
> Emmanuel Tillard
> Veterinaire
> CIRAD-EMVT
> Unite de recherche 18
> 
> UMR868 Elevage des Ruminants en Regions Chaudes (ERRC)
> Campus ENSA-INRA
> 2 place Viala
> 34060 Montpellier cedex 1
> 
> tel:  0499612265 (fixe)
>       0633850598 (gsm)
> fax:  0467545694
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to