Two thoughts on this:
1. Your FDR (Not Franklin Delano Roosevelt) sounds like another name
for Type I error rate. The definition of "reasonably reliable FDRs"
would seem to relate to the status of the literature on this issue among
researchers in genotyping. As more reports of FRDs in genotyping are
published, I would expect that methodology for estimation and the
standard for accuracy would similarly evolve.
2. Have you tried the Bioconductor (www.bioconductor.org/)
listserve? They might be able to say something more useful than a
general list like this.
spencer graves
Dupont, William wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> We are planning a genotyping study to be analyzed using false discovery
> rates (FDRs) (See Storey and Tibshirani PNAS 2003; 100:9440-5). I am
> interested in learning if there is any consensus as to how many
> features (ie. how many P values) need to be studied before reasonably
> reliable FDRs can be derived. Does anyone know of a citation where
> this is discussed?
>
> Bill Dupont
>
> William D. Dupont phone: 615-343-4100 URL
> http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/bin/view/Main/WilliamDupont
>
> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
--
Spencer Graves, PhD
Senior Development Engineer
PDF Solutions, Inc.
333 West San Carlos Street Suite 700
San Jose, CA 95110, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pdf.com <http://www.pdf.com>
Tel: 408-938-4420
Fax: 408-280-7915
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
