Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>"Peter" == Peter Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> on Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:49:10 +0200 writes: >>>>>> > > Peter> In the moment I am writing an R function for drawing > Peter> bagplots (two dimensional boxplots). > Peter> For some elements of the plot are found numerically > Peter> the resulting plots differs a little bit from the correct bagplots. > > Peter> Here is the link to the actual version: > > Peter> > http://www.wiwi.uni-bielefeld.de/~wolf/software/R-wtools/bagplot/bagplot.R > Peter> ( R code ) > > Peter> > http://www.wiwi.uni-bielefeld.de/~wolf/software/R-wtools/bagplot/bagplot.pdf > Peter> (examples and description) > > Peter> Now I am looking for examples to test / to improve my function. > Peter> Where can I get data sets and the corresponding correct bagplots? > >I'll send you my (unpublished) version of my package 'bagplot' >{{the one I've never released because of segmentation fault bugs > somewhere in Fortran}} in a private E-mail. > >In my version I had started make a function > bag() >which *computes* all the information needed and then returns an >(S3) object "bag". Then, the plotting happens via >the > plot.bag <- function(.....) {..........} >method. > >So you can say > > plot(bag(.........), ........) > >if you want both (computing and plotting) at once, but can also >separate the two --- following very much the modern "S" way >"whole object ..". > > >Martin > > Hello Martin,
you are right. Separating computing and plotting is a better way for a public version and I think that I will split my function. But during testing algorithmic problems it is nice to have only one function. Peter ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
