On 1:03:39 am 09/27/05 Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You will have to show us the error! It will be shown in > d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.fail (unless this was a segfault or similar). > > It is not OK to skip the test, but note that this test is random and > does fail about 1 in 50 times, so you could just try rerunning it.
I am so sorry. I didn't even think to look for a .fail file. Here is the last bit of it: >> ## for PR#7902: > ex <- -c(rev(1/x), ex) > All.eq(-x, qcauchy(pcauchy(-x))) [1] TRUE > All.eq(+x, qcauchy(pcauchy(+x, log=TRUE), log=TRUE)) [1] TRUE > All.eq(1/x, pcauchy(qcauchy(1/x))) [1] TRUE > All.eq(ex, pcauchy(qcauchy(ex, log=TRUE), log=TRUE)) [1] "`is.NA' value mismatches: 1 in current, 0 in target" Warning message: NaNs produced in: qcauchy(p, location, scale, lower.tail, log.p) > II <- c(-Inf,Inf) > stopifnot(pcauchy(II) == 0:1, ## qcauchy(0:1) == II, + pcauchy(II, log=TRUE) == c(-Inf,0), + qcauchy(c(-Inf,0), log=TRUE) == II) Error in if (!(is.logical(r <- eval(ll[[i]])) && all(r))) stop(paste(deparse(mc[[i + : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed In addition: Warning message: NaNs produced in: qcauchy(p, location, scale, lower.tail, log.p) Execution halted This is from the latest R-patched source tar ball, and it is the identical error as R-2.1.1. I've consistently gotten the same error, even with configuration file tweaks and making clean between runs. Thanks! Jeff Ross ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
