The article on BMA (Bayesian model averaging) presents most valuable tools for
model selection, but I find one detail confusing in Example 1. In page 4 of
RNews 5/2, second paragraph says that the probability of Time variable not
being in the model is 0.445. It seems to me that the figure should be 1 - 0.445
= 0.555, because p!=0.445 is the prob. of Time variable being in the model. The
plot in Fig.2 is in line with this, since the height of scaled PDF seems to be
0.445 and the black spike points to 0.555. Have I understood this correctly?
Regards, Antti Pirjetä, PhD student, Helsinki School of Economics. Mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Muutoksia sähköpostiosoitteissamme: @hkkk.fi-päätteiset osoitteet ovat
muuttuneet muotoon @hse.fi. Opiskelijoiden (nyt @ky.hkkk.fi) osoitteen
loppuosaksi muuttuu tammikuussa 2006 @student.hse.fi. Vanhoihin osoitteisiin
lähetetyt viestit ohjautuvat muutoksen jälkeenkin perille.
Changes in our e-mail addresses: @hkkk.fi has been replaced by @hse.fi.
Students' e-mail address (@ky.hkkk.fi) will change in January 2006 to
@student.hse.fi. E-mails sent to the old address will be redirected to the new
one.
_____________________________________________________________
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
