?scan is much faser. Also, read.table has a colClasses optional argument
which can be used to speed up the reading of large files significantly.
read.table has a pretty good help section well worth reading.
read.table(file, header = FALSE, sep = "", quote = "\"'", dec = ".",
row.names, col.names, as.is = FALSE, na.strings = "NA",
colClasses = NA, nrows = -1,
skip = 0, check.names = TRUE, fill = !blank.lines.skip,
strip.white = FALSE, blank.lines.skip = TRUE,
comment.char = "#", allowEscapes = FALSE)
2006/2/14, Max Kauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi
> it appears to me that read.table is very slow for reading large data files
> (mine are 200,000 rows). Is there a better way?
> Thanks!
> Max
>
> --
> Maximilian O. Kauer, Ph.D.
> Department of Genetics, White lab
> 333 Cedar St, NSB 386
> PO Box 208005
> New Haven, CT 06510
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
