I carefully tested my suggestions in the current version of R, 2.2.1,
before posting. They DO work, and as you have not even told us your
version of R, we have no idea what you have broken on your R installation.
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Evgeniy Kachalin wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley ?????:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Evgeniy Kachalin wrote:
Hello, dear R users.
What is the easiest and the most visualli understandable way to analize
dependency of numerical variable on two factors?
interaction.plot() is a good start.
Is the
boxplot(y~f1+f2) the good way? It seems that this formula does not work.
No, nor is it documented to: the help page is there to help you. You need a
single factor as the grouping, so make one via an interaction.
boxplot(y ~ f1:f2) should work. E.g.
library(MASS)
boxplot(FL ~ sex:sp, data=crabs)
Does not work:
Îøèáêà â if (any(out[nna])) stats[c(1, 5)] <- range(x[!out], na.rm = TRUE) :
ïðîïóùåííîå çíà÷åíèå, à íóæíî TRUE/FALSE
Âäîáàâîê: Warning messages:
1: + not meaningful for factors in: Ops.factor(x[floor(d)], x[ceiling(d)])
2: < not meaningful for factors in: Ops.factor(x, (stats[2] - coef * iqr))
3: > not meaningful for factors in: Ops.factor(x, (stats[4] + coef * iqr))
Hm...
Another idea is to use lattice's bwplot. E.g.
library(lattice)
bwplot(FL ~ sex | sp, data=crabs)
That's not the point. The scales may differ significantly, also this is not
conviniet for many factors.
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
