I
On 3/10/06 8:33 AM, "Duncan Murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Other than Emacs, I use the same work habits as Adai. An advantage of > this workflow is that almost everything is stored in text format, so it > is easy to compare different versions to see what has changed, and it > works very well with version control (I use Subversion). > > The only thing I'd add to his recommendation is that you be sure to save > the scripts that produced the objects in the binary images (his > "lala.rda"), so that they can be reconstructed if necessary. As long as > the reconstruction isn't too difficult, this means I don't need to > bother to save them in Subversion. I would add a bit of detail here that I do. ESS/xemacs allows one to create a transcript file that you can then step through, executing each command as it was originally executed. I make one of these transcript files for each project and save it with the data and any scripts that I have for the project. So, in the end, I have a set of Rda files, one or more transcript files, and a Src directory that contains any function code (and ESS supports saving scripts to this directory automatically). Sean ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
