CG Pettersson <cg.pettersson <at> evp.slu.se> writes: > > > Fitting and reducing a first model for grain yield went smoothly. When I > wanted to look at the fixed effects with estimable() I got an error > message claiming that I was using the wrong variable names, estimable > wanted the variable names in the form usually given by fixed.effects().
... > What is happening? > Is there a new namecheck in estimable acting a little over-enthusiastic or > what? > Yes, estimable has change that it accepts parameter NAMES now, and this might collide with some implicit typecasting: Docs: "If cm is a vector, it should contained named elements each of which gives the coefficient to be applied to the corresponding parameter. " Since you did not provide a runnable example, I cannot check in detail what was wrong. Dieter ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
