On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:50:36 -0500 Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:49 -0300, Rolf Turner wrote: > > Duncan Murdoch wrote (amongst other things): > > > > > Statistical computing is not easy, so how could R be? Who has > > > ever claimed it is? Any package that makes statistical computing > > > appear to be easy is probably giving you wrong answers half the > > > time, or is extremely limited in scope. > > > > Well expressed, Duncan! (A slam Dunc, one might say. :-) ) > > > > cheers, > > > > Rolf > > In looking back at the archive, I don't see an indication of someone > suggesting that Duncan's prose might be a candidate for the fortunes() > package, unless Achim has already done so... :-)
...I was waiting for someone to suggest it ;-) Done now. We're also beginning to have enough new fortunes for a new release...will try to put it out soon. Best, Z > Regards, > > Marc > > ______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide! > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
