> From: Dirk Eddelbuettel > > On 19 May 2006 at 14:20, (Ted Harding) wrote: > | than you, what that seems to spell out -- maybe "R-Social" > | might be better).
A ROT-SIG list? > Perfect! Those with bruises from asking silly or uninformed > questions on r-help can refer to that list as ... R-AntiSocial. > > Just kidding. I'd be up for an off-topic list with a more > discerning look at publically fudged and quoted numbers. > Carl Bialik does something related in his "Numbers Guy" > column at the on-line Wall Street Journal, but that requires > a subscription. For more such statistics (and if you've got 24 minutes to spare), see http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-869183917758574879. Andy > Dirk > > -- > Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. > -- Thomas A. Edison > > ______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide! > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > > ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
