I think I was just comparing the ones that were discussed but certainly the vector format used on Windows is normally emf or wmf and that is what I would normally use too.
On 6/23/06, Michael H. Prager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Previous posters have argued for EPS files as a desirable transfer > format for quality reasons. This is of course true when the output is > through a Postscript device. > > However, the original poster is making presentations with PowerPoint. > Those essentially are projected from the screen -- and screens of > Windows PCs are NOT Postscript devices. The version of PowerPoint I > have will display a bitmapped, low-resolution preview when EPS is > imported, and that is what will be projected. It is passable, but much > better can be done! > > In this application, I have had best results using cut and paste or the > Windows metafile format, both of which (as others have said) give > scalable vector graphics. When quirks of Windows metafile arise (as > they can do, especially when fonts differ between PCs), I have had good > results with PNG for line art and JPG for other art. > > Mike > > -- > Michael Prager, Ph.D. > Southeast Fisheries Science Center > NOAA Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research > Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 > ** Opinions expressed are personal, not official. No > ** official endorsement of any product is made or implied. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
