"Celso Barros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Dear List,
> 
> I apologize in advance if this is silly. I tried to replicate an analysis I
> did previously in SPSS using R, and was surprised to find different results.
> 
> 
> So my question is: shouldn't the following SPSS syntax
> 
> 
> REGRESSION
> 
> DEPENDENT INC89
> 
> /METHOD=ENTER hiedyrs experien SE93rec.
> 
> Yeld the same results of the following R command
> 
> modelB<-lm(INC89~HIEDYRS+EXPERIEN+SE93REC)

Possibly, if all variables are quantitative.

What are the differences that you see?
 
> 
> I assume the is some difference in some default options.Or maybe it was a
> problem when the data was imported. After using the read.spss in the foreign
> package, I got the following warning message:
> 
> Unrecognized record type 7, subtype 16 encountered in system file

You might check whether your variables have the same summary
statistics in both systems.
 
> Thanks in advance for the help and apologies for the trouble,
> 
> 
> Celso
> 
>       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> 

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Ă˜ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark          Ph:  (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])                  FAX: (+45) 35327907

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to