Dear Pref. Fox Sorry, I didn't receive your reply. I try the new sem package. It's great. The following is the results that I got. The fit indices are fine.
Model Chisquare = 208 Df = 98 Pr(>Chisq) = 6.6e-10 Chisquare (null model) = 1741 Df = 120 Goodness-of-fit index = 0.9 Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = 0.87 RMSEA index = 0.066 90 % CI: (0.054, 0.079) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = 0.88 Tucker-Lewis NNFI = 0.92 Bentler CFI = 0.93 BIC = -336 Thank you very much. You help me out so many problems. Best wishes, Wei-Wei 2006/9/4, John Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear Wei-Wei, > > As I explained to you in private email yesterday (perhaps you didn't receive > my reply?), the problem that you point out is due to a bug in the sem > function that I fixed some time ago and then inadvertently reintroduced. > Yesterday, I sent a corrected version of the sem package (0.9-5) to CRAN; > the source package is there now and I'm sure that the compiled Windows > package will appear in due course. > > Thank you once more for bringing the problem to my attention. > > John > ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
