Carmen, Gabor has already given you the detail you ask for, but might try the following plot to see what is going wrong:
plot(times(tt), x, type='l') This does not give you the EXACT control of the axis you asked for, but this simple plot command gives you a fairly nice result. It illustrates that your code is failing becasue you are plotting x against the index of x rather than plotting x against time. At least this is what I think the misunderstanding is. HTH > Please provide a complete self contained example. I can't follow the > partial code below; however, its likely you are plotting one thing > and creating axes using another so there is no reason it should > come out right. > > On 11/8/06, Carmen Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gabor Grothendieck schrieb: >> > Your code plots x which has nothing to do with xt. >> > >> The same result if you change xt to x: 02:25 at the origin nothing else >> - I do not know why >> #---------- your suggestion -------- >> mn <- times(min_time) >> mx <- times(max_time) >> n <- 12 >> >> t <- times(seq(mn, mx, length = n)) >> >> t <- times(unique(sub("..$", "00", t))) >> >> axis(1, x, sub(":00$", "", x)) # works only with plot data before >> >> >> >> Regards Carmen >> > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.