Carmen,
Gabor has already given you the detail you ask for, but might try the
following plot to see what is going wrong:
plot(times(tt), x, type='l')
This does not give you the EXACT control of the axis you asked for, but this
simple plot command gives you a fairly nice result. It illustrates that
your code is failing becasue you are plotting x against the index of x
rather than plotting x against time. At least this is what I think the
misunderstanding is.
HTH
> Please provide a complete self contained example. I can't follow the
> partial code below; however, its likely you are plotting one thing
> and creating axes using another so there is no reason it should
> come out right.
>
> On 11/8/06, Carmen Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gabor Grothendieck schrieb:
>> > Your code plots x which has nothing to do with xt.
>> >
>> The same result if you change xt to x: 02:25 at the origin nothing else
>> - I do not know why
>> #---------- your suggestion --------
>> mn <- times(min_time)
>> mx <- times(max_time)
>> n <- 12
>>
>> t <- times(seq(mn, mx, length = n))
>>
>> t <- times(unique(sub("..$", "00", t)))
>>
>> axis(1, x, sub(":00$", "", x)) # works only with plot data before
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards Carmen
>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
