Thank you for your rapid response.

This is reproducible on my system.  Here it is again, with, I hope,
sufficient detail to properly document what does not work and what
does on my system,

But my original question, properly motivated or not, concerns whether
there is a way to use or adapt deriv() to work if a term is indexed,
as here my term beta is indexed by Gun?

In any case, it is puzzling that the error is not reproducible and so
I would be curious to track that down, if it is specific to my system.

Thank you. Before retrying, I upgraded to the latest patched version
(details at the end).

####The data, again
dd
Lum     GL      Gun     mBl
0.15    0       rouge   0.09
0.07    15      rouge   0.01
0.1     31      rouge   0.04
0.19    47      rouge   0.13
0.4     63      rouge   0.34
0.73    79      rouge   0.67
1.2     95      rouge   1.14
1.85    111     rouge   1.79
2.91    127     rouge   2.85
3.74    143     rouge   3.68
5.08    159     rouge   5.02
6.43    175     rouge   6.37
8.06    191     rouge   8
9.84    207     rouge   9.78
12      223     rouge   11.94
14.2    239     rouge   14.14
16.6    255     rouge   16.54
0.1     0       vert    0.04
0.1     15      vert    0.04
0.17    31      vert    0.11
0.46    47      vert    0.4
1.08    63      vert    1.02
2.22    79      vert    2.16
3.74    95      vert    3.68
5.79    111     vert    5.73
8.36    127     vert    8.3
11.6    143     vert    11.54
15.4    159     vert    15.34
19.9    175     vert    19.84
24.6    191     vert    24.54
30.4    207     vert    30.34
36.1    223     vert    36.04
43      239     vert    42.94
49.9    255     vert    49.84
0.06    0       bleu    0
0.06    15      bleu    0
0.08    31      bleu    0.02
0.13    47      bleu    0.07
0.25    63      bleu    0.19
0.43    79      bleu    0.37
0.66    95      bleu    0.6
1.02    111     bleu    0.96
1.46    127     bleu    1.4
1.93    143     bleu    1.87
2.49    159     bleu    2.43
3.2     175     bleu    3.14
3.96    191     bleu    3.9
4.9     207     bleu    4.84
5.68    223     bleu    5.62
6.71    239     bleu    6.65
7.93    255     bleu    7.87

###For initial values - this time using plinear algorithm insted of optim
gg <- model.matrix(~-1 + Gun/GL, dd)[ , c(4:6)]
dd.plin <- nls(Lum ~ cbind(rep(1, 51), gg^gamm), data = dd,
                                start = list(gamm = 2.4),
                                alg = "plinear"
                                )
B <- as.vector(coef(dd.plin))
st <-list(Blev = B[2], beta = B[3:5], gamm = B[1])


dd.nls <- nls(Lum ~ Blev + beta[Gun] * GL^gamm,
                        data = dd, start = st
                        )
confint(dd.plin)

Waiting for profiling to be done...
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : (subscript) logical subscript too long
###  Here is the error that I observe
confint(dd.nls)
Waiting for profiling to be done...
Error in prof$getProfile() : step factor 0.000488281 reduced below
'minFactor' of 0.000976562

dd.deriv2 <- function (Blev, beta, gamm, GL)
{
    .expr1 <- GL^gamm
    .value <- Blev + rep(beta, each = 17) * .expr1
    .grad <- array(0, c(length(.value), 5), list(NULL, c("Blev",
        "beta.rouge", "beta.vert", "beta.bleu", "gamm")))
    .grad[, "Blev"] <- 1
    .grad[1:17, "beta.rouge"] <- .expr1[1:17]
    .grad[18:34, "beta.vert"] <- .expr1[1:17]
    .grad[35:51, "beta.bleu"] <- .expr1[1:17]
    .grad[, "gamm"] <- ifelse(GL == 0, 0, rep(beta, each = 17) * (.expr1 *
log(GL)))
    attr(.value, "gradient") <- .grad
    .value
}

dd.nls.d2 <- nls(Lum ~ dd.deriv2(Blev, beta, gamm, GL), subset(dd, Gun !=
"gris"),
                        start = list(Blev = B[2], beta = B[3:5], gamm = B[1]))


#####But not here
confint(dd.nls.d2)
Waiting for profiling to be done...
               2.5%        97.5%
Blev  -1.612492e-01 2.988387e-02
beta1  1.269000e-05 1.792914e-05
beta2  3.844042e-05 5.388546e-05
beta3  6.108282e-06 8.762679e-06
gamm   2.481102e+00 2.542966e+00

R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-11-16 r39921)
i386-apple-darwin8.8.1

locale:
C

attached base packages:
[1] "stats"     "graphics"  "grDevices" "utils"     "datasets"
[6] "methods"   "base"

other attached packages:
     MASS   lattice
 "7.2-29" "0.14-13"

best,

ken


Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> Please provide reproducible code which shows the error.
>
>>
>> st <- list(Blev = -0.06551802, beta = c(1.509686e-05, 4.55525e-05,
> + 7.32272e-06), gamm = 2.51187)
>>
>> dd.nls <- nls(Lum ~ Blev + beta[Gun] * GL^gamm,
> +                        data = dd, start = st)
>>
>> confint(dd.nls)
> Waiting for profiling to be done...
>                2.5%        97.5%
> Blev  -1.612492e-01 2.988388e-02
> beta1  6.108282e-06 8.762679e-06
> beta2  1.269000e-05 1.792914e-05
> beta3  3.844042e-05 5.388546e-05
> gamm   2.481102e+00 2.542966e+00
>> R.version.string
> [1] "R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-10-24 r39722)"
>
>
>
>
> On 11/17/06, Ken Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm fitting a standard nonlinear model to the luminances measured
>> from the red, green and blue guns of a TV display, using nls.
>>
>> The call is:
>>
>> dd.nls <- nls(Lum ~ Blev + beta[Gun] * GL^gamm,
>>                        data = dd, start = st)
>> where st was initally estimated using optim()
>>
>> st
>> $Blev
>> [1] -0.06551802
>>
>> $beta
>> [1] 1.509686e-05 4.555250e-05 7.322720e-06
>>
>> $gamm
>> [1] 2.511870
>>
>> This works fine but I received an error message when I tried to
>> use confint().  I thought that getting derivatives with deriv might
>> help but found that deriv does not automatically handle the
>> indexing of the beta parameter.  I modified the output of deriv
>> from the case when the term beta is not indexed to give:
>>
>> dd.deriv2 <- function (Blev, beta, gamm, GL)
>> {
>>    .expr1 <- GL^gamm
>>    .value <- Blev + rep(beta, each = 17) * .expr1
>>    .grad <- array(0, c(length(.value), 5), list(NULL, c("Blev",
>>        "beta.rouge", "beta.vert", "beta.bleu", "gamm"  )))
>>    .grad[, "Blev"] <- 1
>>    .grad[1:17, "beta.rouge"] <- .expr1[1:17]
>>    .grad[18:34, "beta.vert"] <- .expr1[1:17]
>>    .grad[35:51, "beta.bleu"] <- .expr1[1:17]
>>    .grad[, "gamm"] <- ifelse(GL == 0, 0, rep(beta, each = 17) * (.expr1
>> *
>> log(GL)))
>>    attr(.value, "gradient") <- .grad
>>    .value
>> }
>>
>> which is not general but
>> now I can get a result from confint. My question:  Can deriv()
>> be made to handle an indexed term more automatically (elegantly)?
>> I think that this would become more urgent (or require more work
>> on my part) if I were to want the Hessian, too, for example, in
>> anticipation of using rms.curv as described in the on-line
>> complements for MASS.
>>
>> The plinear algorithm can be used for this model (it is similar in some
>> respects to the example given on p 218 of MASS, but the intercept
>> terms are indexed instead, there).
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions.
>>
>> best,
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ken Knoblauch
>> Inserm U371
>> Institut Cellule Souche et Cerveau
>> Département Neurosciences Intégratives
>> 18 avenue du Doyen Lépine
>> 69500 Bron
>> France
>> tel: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 77
>> fax: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 61
>> portable: +33 (0)6 84 10 64 10
>> http://www.lyon.inserm.fr/371/
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> [email protected] mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>


-- 
Ken Knoblauch
Inserm U371
Institut Cellule Souche et Cerveau
Département Neurosciences Intégratives
18 avenue du Doyen Lépine
69500 Bron
France
tel: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 77
fax: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 61
portable: +33 (0)6 84 10 64 10
http://www.lyon.inserm.fr/371/

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to