Re-sending to the list as I just got nailed by the "too many recipients" issue...
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:05 -0600, Marc Schwartz wrote: > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 17:37 +0100, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > > Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: > > > Hi Marc, > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation! I'll give it a try. (But > > > still, why emacs23? what is missing in v. 21 that you get in 23?). > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > R. > > > > > Ability to load files with UTF-8 characters in the name? (This is pretty > > maddening if you find yourself with such a beast.) > > > > BTW, any inkling when/whether this is heading for Fedora N? Peter, 21.4 is what is presently in the FC7 development trunk (aka rawhide), so I would not expect to see it as a mainstream offering for some time. Needless to say, 23 is still alpha, so the FC timeline is likely more dependent on the upstream timeline to bring 23 to a stable release. Bill Nottingham at RH recently posted this summary of planned key updates to FC7: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00091.html and based upon subsequent communications, there has been at least one addition, which is the previously discussed replacement of teTeX with TeXLive: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureTexLive BTW, for the Ubuntu users in the audience, I happened to come across these sites: http://peadrop.com/blog/2007/01/06/pretty-emacs/ http://debs.peadrop.com/dists/edgy/backports/ HTH, Marc ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
