Was make.link() used in the example code? On 2/11/07, Ken Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't it the case, that since R 2.40 that all one ought to need do is > define one's own link and pass it to the family, rather re-defining the whole > family? > > CHANGES IN R VERSION 2.4.0 > > ... > > o make.link() now returns an object of class "link-glm". > The GLM families accept an object of this class for their > 'link' argument, which allows user-specified link functions. > Also, quasi() allows user-specified variance functions. > > I thought that was the point of the example on the family help page. > > ken > > > Douglas Bates a écrit : > Look at the 'link' component of the two lists. In the binomial family > object the link component is a character vector of link 1. In your > logexposure family object it is a list of length 5. > > On 2/10/07, Jessi Brown <jessilbrown at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok, I've tried checking out the structure of the binomial and > > logexposure families, the big difference appears to be the valideta > > parameter (it's "NULL" in the logexposure family). > > > -- > Ken Knoblauch > Inserm U846 > Institut Cellule Souche et Cerveau > Département Neurosciences Intégratives > 18 avenue du Doyen Lépine > 69500 Bron > France > tel: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 77 > fax: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 61 > portable: +33 (0)6 84 10 64 10 > http://www.lyon.inserm.fr/371/ > >
______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
