"Kevin R. Coombes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [2] You are also correct that there is no advantage if I just call > them "chunk1" and "chunk2". But if I call them something more > interesting, like "perform.quantile.normalization" or > "truncate.and.log.transform", > then I can use this structure to explain the algorithm at a higher > level. If you go back to Knuth's original literate programming > examples, this is exactly how he presents his examples. For instance, > on page 104 of the "Literate Programming" book, he has
I suspect it would not be too hard to write an Sweave driver that would respond to an expand=FALSE argument in the way you want. -- But I'm not certain. I've never used nested code chunks (!) and that may make such a modification difficult. + seth ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
