I am having trouble figuring out the right form for the nlme arguments.  I do 
have examples in Modern and Applied Statistics with S and from other sources, 
but I still can't figure it out. 

I am trying to estimate species richness (sr) in streams across minnesota.  My 
predictor variables are depth (d), habitat diversity (habdiv), drainage area 
(da) and an indicator variable representing the watershed/basins that the 
streams are in (bas: there are 10 watersheds).  The variable explaining the 
greatest amount of variation appears to be da.  I have used a log(da) to 
linearize the relationship, but an asymptotic relationship is more appropriate. 
I have used nls:

B<-c(.007,1,3,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,.05,.001,.8)
st<-list(ad=B[1],ahabdiv=B[2],abas=B[3:12],b=B[13],c=B[14],z=B[15])
modnls.a<-nls(sr~ad*log(d)+ahabdiv*habdiv+abas[bas]+(b/(c+(da^-z))),
    start=st,trace=T)

I next used a random slope and intercept model using lmer from the package 
(lme4). 

modlme<-lmer(y~d+habdiv+log(da)+(log(da)|bas),method='ML')

What I would like to do is use a similar model to the modlme, but use 
(b/(c+(da^-z))) instead of log(da).  Keeping d and habdiv as fixed effects and 
the sr-da relationship for each basin as a random effect.  For the life of me I 
can not figure out the proper form of nlme.  Any help would be greatly 
appreciated.  

Fsr<-function(da,b,c,z){b/(c+(da^-z}
modnlme<-nlme(sr~d+habdiv+Fsr(da,b,c,z),
    fixed=,
    random=,
    start=)

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to