Sorry, that was a typo. Actually there wasn't a comma after 'function(m)'
in my expression.
So I'll try to increase the threshould to see if that works.
Thanks a lot!
From: "jim holtman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "zhihua li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [R] Error: evaluation nested too deeply when doing heatmap
with binary distfunction
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:19:54 -0400
you seem to have a syntax error in your statement. There appears to
be an extra commas after 'function(m),'. I think is should be:
heatmap(X,
distfun=function(c)dist(c,method="bin"),hclustfun=function(m)hclust(m,method="average"))
On 7/18/07, zhihua li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi netters,
I have a matrix X of the size (1000,100). The values are from -3 to
+3.
When I tried
heatmap(X,
distfun=function(c),dist(c,method="bin"),hclustfun=function(m),hclust(m,method="average"))
I got the error message:
Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion /
options(expressions=)?
However, if I used default parameters for distfunction:
heatmap(X, hclustfun=function(m),hclust(m,method="average"))
there is no error messages at all.
But the problem is that I have to use binary method in my
disfunction. How
can I resolve the problem?
Thanks a lot!
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Jim Holtman
Cincinnati, OH
+1 513 646 9390
What is the problem you are trying to solve?
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
