Merged file can become:
... current file1 contents ...
f <- function() {
... current file 2 contents ...
}
and then source that followed by running your middle code
followed by running f().
Of course, you may need to make some changes in the body
of f due to the changed scoping that this introduces.
On 8/3/07, Dennis Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Colleagues:
>
> I have encountered the following situation:
> SERIES OF COMMANDS
> source("File1")
> MORE COMMANDS
> source("File2")
>
> Optimally, I would like File1 and File2 to be merged into a single
> file (FileMerged). However, if I wrote the following:
> SERIES OF COMMANDS
> source("FileMerged")
> MORE COMMANDS
>
> I encounter an error: the File2 portion of FileMerged contains
> commands that cannot be executed properly until "MORE COMMANDS" are
> executed. Similarly, sourcing FileMerged after MORE COMMANDS does
> not work because MORE COMMANDS requires the information from the
> File1 portion of FileMerged.
>
> I am looking for a means to source FileMerged but not execute some of
> the commands immediately. Functionally this would look like:
> SERIES OF COMMANDS
> source("FileMerged") # but withhold execution of some of the
> commands
> MORE COMMANDS
> COMMAND TO EXECUTE THE WITHHELD COMMANDS
>
> Does R offer some option to accomplish this?
>
> Dennis
>
> Dennis Fisher MD
> P < (The "P Less Than" Company)
> Phone: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784)
> Fax: 1-415-564-2220
> www.PLessThan.com
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
