I must admit I had never realised this so thanks to Monica for raising it.  

Round-to-even is used for statistical reasons and there is some point as it 
obviously reduces bias.  But why should the decision  be to round to the 
nearest even number?  rounding to the nearest odd number would be equally 
valid.  (signif(x,0) is the same as round(). )

There is a debate and sometimes you need symmetric rounding.  Perhaps there 
should be an option in round that defaults to round-to-even for compatibility 
but includes the various other rounding approaches as seen for example in 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding

BTW with Fortran the 'nearest integer' approach is used:

      REAL*8 TEST
10    CONTINUE
         READ(*,*)TEST
         WRITE(*,*)TEST,IDNINT(TEST)
      GOTO 10
      END

Compiling this under g77 and gfortran gives the result:
~ $ g77 idnint.f -o idnint
~ $ ./idnint
1.5
  1.5 2
2.5
  2.5 3

~ $ gfortran idnint.f -o idnint
~ $ ./idnint
2.5
   2.50000000000000                3
1.5
   1.50000000000000                2

Octave:

octave:1> round(1.5)
ans = 2
octave:2> round(2.5)
ans = 3

On Thursday 02 August 2007 21:46:36 Monica Pisica wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Mea culpa for not reading help pages before hand - but one would not go
> there when the function syntax is obvious and known .... besides other
> programming languages (for example IDL) with same function do not round to
> the next even number .... so i do get 3 for round(2.5), and i didn't
> realize that it is "normal" for R to give a 2 instead of 3.> Date: Thu, 2
> Aug 2007 22:38:49 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch> Subject: Re: [R] -
> round() strange behaviour> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Monica Pisica wrote:> > >>
> > Hi,> >> > I am getting some strange results using round - it seems that
> it depends if the number before the decimal point is odd or even ....> >> >
> For example:> >> > > round(1.5)[1] 2> round(2.5)[1] 2> > While i would
> expect that round(2.5) be 3 and not 2.> >> > Do you have any explanation
> for that?> > Yes: you obviously did not read the man page! Please do.> Z> >
> > I really appreciate your input,> >> > Monica> >> >> >
> _________________________________________________________________> >
> [[trailing spam removed]]> >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]> >> >
> ______________________________________________> > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
> mailing list> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> > PLEASE do
> read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html> > and
> provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.> >> >>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Messenger Caf� � open for fun 24/7. Hot games, cool activities served
> daily. Visit now.
>
>       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]



-- 
Best wishes

John

John Logsdon                               "Try to make things as simple
Quantex Research Ltd, Manchester UK         as possible but not simpler"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44(0)161 445 4951/G:+44(0)7717758675       www.quantex-research.com

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to