Hi,I am puzzled with different results in R, compared to SPSS and 
Senstools.Net. After running a PCA on the three software (for R, I use the PCA 
function programmed on the FactoMineR package), I extracted the loadings. In 
the three cases, the loadings are exactly identical.Then, I applied the varimax 
rotation on these loadings, and unfortunately, the results differ. A quick look 
at the resulting rotation matrix (rotmat) shows me, that the results are 
"sorted" differently. Here are my results for the rotation matrix:On R: > 
complet.varimax <- varimax(complet.loadings,normalize=T)$rotmat> 
complet.varimax      [,1]    [,2]    [,3]    [,4]   [,5]   [,6]   [,7]   
[,8][1,]  0.529  -0.034  -0.411  -0.428  0.013 -0.297 -0.399  0.344[2,] -0.119  
 0.715  -0.194  -0.058  0.517 -0.219 -0.068 -0.337[3,]  0.081   0.087   0.722  
-0.017  0.250 -0.472  0.092  0.413[4,]  0.110   0.039  -0.172   0.860  0.139 
-0.013 -0.343  0.284[5,] -0.159  -0.353  -0.419   0.010  0.502 -0.114  0.578  
0.275[6,!
 ] -0.122  -0.065   0.184  -0.240  0.502  0.670 -0.357  0.248[7,]  0.612   
0.409   0.026   0.070 -0.061  0.420  0.497  0.159[8,] -0.522   0.427  -0.181  
-0.107 -0.379  0.043  0.042  0.595On SPSS and Senstools.Net:Rotation     dim 1  
  dim 2    dim 3    dim 4    dim 5    dim 6    dim 7    dim 8dim 1        -0,53 
   -0,41    -0,43    -0,40     0,03    -0,34    -0,30    -0,01dim 2         
0,12    -0,19    -0,06    -0,07    -0,71     0,34    -0,22    -0,52dim 3        
-0,08     0,72    -0,02     0,09    -0,09    -0,41    -0,47    -0,25dim 4       
 -0,11    -0,17     0,86    -0,34    -0,04    -0,28    -0,01    -0,14dim 5      
   0,16    -0,42     0,01     0,58     0,35    -0,27    -0,11    -0,50dim 6     
    0,12     0,18    -0,24    -0,36     0,07    -0,25     0,67    -0,50dim 7    
     0,61    -0,03    -0,07    -0,50     0,41     0,16    -0,42    -0,06dim 8   
     -0,52     0,18     0,11    -0,04     0,43     0,60    -0,04    -0,38 Here, 
we can clearly see, that the results are!
  similar, but sorted differently (in R, the second column correspond t
o the 5th column in SPSS or Senstools.Net).Concerning the loadings after 
rotation, the results are different to (permutation are seen too).Please, could 
someone explain me what's happening?Personally, I have the feeling that the 
results differ...is it true? Which results should I trust?Should you need any 
further information for answering me, do not hesitate to contact me ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED]).I look forward to your response.Best regards, WORCH Thierry
_________________________________________________________________

[[replacing trailing spam]]

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to