In response to some comments I've been getting, I should clarify that I mean genuine errata that are NOT due to updates in R since the book went to press. We've found several genuine errata so far - most are trivial, of course, but some have the potential to confuse beginners (e.g. my students). As I said, I wasn't compiling them systematically, but I think I should now, given that nobody else seems to be checking (besides HB himself - he tells me he's hoping to post an errata page online when time permits). The errors may not be obvious if you're using the book as a reference, but they jump out when you go through it line by line in a class, as we've been doing.
- jm > I'm going through Baayen (2008) with a gang of students this semester, > and occasionally we hit upon an anomaly (e.g. actual output not matching > what's shown in the book - in cases where randomization isn't involved). > Since > Cambridge put the book out in paperback, I assume bazillions of classes > all over the world are going through the book as well. Is anybody > compiling a list of errata? I haven't been doing it systematically, since > I assumed somebody else > was, but maybe I should go back and check again (we're about halfway > through). > > -- > James Myers > Graduate Institute of Linguistics > National Chung Cheng University > 168 University Road, Min-Hsiung > Chia-Yi 62102 > TAIWAN > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: http://www.ccunix.ccu.edu.tw/~lngmyers/ > Phone: 886-5-242-8251 > Fax: 886-5-272-1654 _______________________________________________ R-lang mailing list [email protected] http://pidgin.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/r-lang
