On 31/07/2015 7:11 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote: > It seems arguable that this is actually a roxygen bug - the function > that's actually exported from the package does not have a type > argument.
The package fails R CMD check because of a bad .Rd file. If a user had written that file, it would be user error, but roxygen2 wrote it, so I'd say it's pretty clearly a roxygen2 bug. Duncan Murdoch > > Hadley > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Kevin Ushey <kevinus...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've posted an MRE at https://github.com/klutometis/roxygen/issues/362. >> >> The issue occurs when a function and an S4 generic have the same name; >> I imagine this is fairly uncommon? Wouldn't the function be masked by >> the S4 generic and effectively be invisible after the package was >> loaded? >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Hadley Wickham <h.wick...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 30/07/2015 9:14 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>>>> On 30/07/2015 8:49 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote: >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a package stable and working. Now, I am trying to consolidate >>>> some functions that share similar inputs. Example below. So, I branched >>>> on github and work with the branch but now when I run the R check in studio >>>> I get the following warning: >>>>>> >>>>>> * checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING >>>>>> Documented arguments not in \usage in documentation object >>>> 'Effective.Measure': >>>>>> ‘type’ >>>>>> >>>>>> Clearly type is documented. Perhaps this is an R studio/git hub issue. >>>> Travis tells me the build is broken. I am trying to build and work with >>>> the package within standards so I am not sure what happened. Maybe this >>>> is not a topic that belongs here but I can't find answers on the internet. >>>>> >>>>> No, it's not clear that type is documented. You're only showing us the >>>>> .R file, not the .Rd file that Roxygen (?) produced from it. >>>> >>>> Discussion went private for a few emails, so to finish this thread here: >>>> >>>> Turns out roxygen2 was generating a bad .Rd file, so this is a roxygen2 >>>> bug. >>>> >>>> I'd really appreciate it if someone would file a bug on this. >>> >>> Hadley >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://had.co.nz/ >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > > ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
