Before I change the NAMESPACE file, error is : -------------------------------------------------------------- * checking examples ... ERROR Running examples in ‘plfMA-Ex.R’ failed The error most likely occurred in:
> base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv") > ### Name: plfMA > ### Title: A function to launch the plfMA GUI. > ### Aliases: plfMA > ### Keywords: GUI > > ### ** Examples > > library(plfMA) > x<-matrix(1:100,ncol=10) > plfMA(x) Error: could not find function "plfMA" Execution halted -------------------------------------------------------------- Now, I have added the first statement in NAMESPACE file with -------------------------------------------- exportPattern("^[[:alpha:]]+") ------------------------------------------ The error has gone. I think, the error is fixed. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de > wrote: > Well, not running an examples because of an error is a bad idea, you > should fix the issue that caused the error first. > > And when I meant you should make available package and check log I meant > the version where you did not hide the problems. > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > On 18.05.2017 10:55, dharmapal burne wrote: > >> Respected Sir/Ma'am. >> >> I have checked Description file and man files. In the description field, >> only text is there but not my name or my PC name. >> >> I am not getting errors while checking as cran. >> But unfornutately, automated checking at CRAN generating errors >> especially in example section. >> >> I have modified the example section to avoid that error (I have used >> dontrun\{}). >> This is my 00check.log content: >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ---------------------------- >> * using log directory ‘/home/vvlab/Desktop/pflMA_1.0.4/plfMA.Rcheck’ >> * using R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) >> * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) >> * using session charset: UTF-8 >> * checking for file ‘plfMA/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK >> * checking extension type ... Package >> * this is package ‘plfMA’ version ‘1.0.4’ >> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... OK >> Maintainer: ‘Dhammapal Bharne <dhammap...@uohyd.ac.in >> <mailto:dhammap...@uohyd.ac.in>>’ >> >> * checking package namespace information ... OK >> * checking package dependencies ... OK >> * checking if this is a source package ... OK >> * checking if there is a namespace ... OK >> * checking for executable files ... OK >> * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK >> * checking for portable file names ... OK >> * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK >> * checking whether package ‘plfMA’ can be installed ... OK >> * checking installed package size ... OK >> * checking package directory ... OK >> * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK >> * checking top-level files ... OK >> * checking for left-over files ... OK >> * checking index information ... OK >> * checking package subdirectories ... OK >> * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK >> * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK >> * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK >> * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... >> OK >> * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK >> * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies >> ... OK >> * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK >> * checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK >> * checking dependencies in R code ... OK >> * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK >> * checking replacement functions ... OK >> * checking foreign function calls ... OK >> * checking R code for possible problems ... OK >> * checking Rd files ... OK >> * checking Rd metadata ... OK >> * checking Rd line widths ... OK >> * checking Rd cross-references ... OK >> * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK >> * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK >> * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK >> * checking Rd contents ... OK >> * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK >> * checking examples ... OK >> * checking PDF version of manual ... OK >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ---------------------------------------- >> I think, there are no errors now. >> Shall I resubmit the tar file to CRAN? >> >> Thank you. >> >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Uwe Ligges >> <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de >> <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 18.05.2017 09:07, dharmapal burne wrote: >> >> The name is automatically getting generated after executing the >> command >> "R CMD build plfMA". >> It is my system name. >> I think, we should consider it as false positive. >> >> >> Your system name should not be spell checked, perhapos you provide >> check log and package on some web resources so that poeple are able >> tpo help? >> >> Best, >> Uwe Ligges >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Uwe Ligges >> <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de >> <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> >> <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de >> <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 17.05.2017 16:34, michel.grze...@inrs.fr >> <mailto:michel.grze...@inrs.fr> >> <mailto:michel.grze...@inrs.fr >> >> <mailto:michel.grze...@inrs.fr>> wrote: >> >> The spell checking of the DESCRIPTION file of my package >> have >> issued a >> NOTE concerning authors' name of articles appearing in the >> "description" >> field. >> Is there a a way to fix this problem or shall I consider >> this >> NOTE as a >> false positive? >> >> I was not able to find any indication in "Writing R >> Extension" >> about how >> to include names in the "description" field. >> >> >> If the spell checks have false positives, that's OK and your >> package >> won't be rejected. >> Nevertheless, software names should be written single quotes >> as >> 'package' and functions with parentheses as in foo(). >> >> Best, >> Uwe Ligges >> >> >> >> >> Best, >> Michel >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>> mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>> >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org >> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>> >> mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best, >> *DHAMMAPAL BHARNE, >> * >> PhD Research Scholar, >> *University of Hyderabad, >> * >> Mobile: 91 9492274285 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best, >> *DHAMMAPAL BHARNE, >> * >> PhD Research Scholar, >> *University of Hyderabad, >> * >> Mobile: 91 9492274285 >> >> -- Best, *DHAMMAPAL BHARNE,* PhD Research Scholar, *University of Hyderabad,* Mobile: 91 9492274285 [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel