Hi, It's not only your test, but the rstanarm package is erroring in most flavours: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rstanarm.html
You should alert the maintainer. Regards, Iñaki 2017-09-19 9:53 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lüdecke <d.luede...@uke.de>: > Hi, > > I have a package on CRAN where most check results are OK except two with > errors (one of those two I'm already addressing). > > However, the one of the errors > (https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-release-osx- > x86_64/sjstats-00chec > k.html) is because I use the package "rstanarm" for one of the examples, > and > running this example fails. What would be an appropriate way to deal with > this issue? My package does not depend on rstanarm, it's "just" a > suggestion > because I needed it for the examples. I'm a bit unsure about the status of > these check results. When submitting a package, the maintainer is asked to > address issues from these checks, so I'd like to fix this error. I could, > of > course, wrap the example into a "don't run"-section, but this seems to me > like a sloppy hack rather than a proper solution... > > Best > Daniel > > > -- > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; Körperschaft des öffentlichen > Rechts; Gerichtsstand: Hamburg | www.uke.de > Vorstandsmitglieder: Prof. Dr. Burkhard Göke (Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. Dr. > Uwe Koch-Gromus, Joachim Prölß, Martina Saurin (komm.) > _____________________________________________________________________ > > SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE PRINTING > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > -- Iñaki Úcar http://www.enchufa2.es @Enchufa2 <https://twitter.com/#%21/Enchufa2> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
