Dear all, I had realized that they were internal functions.
However, I was conjecturing that the maintainer intends for them to be employed by package users and that use of the ':::' operator might be acceptable in these circumstances. It appears not and I have modified my package to remove all occurrences of ':::'. Thanks to all for your comments, Chris -----Original Message----- From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Uwe Ligges Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 6:33 PM To: Dario Strbenac; r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem enhancing a package with a predict method not declared to be an S3 method And of course, you can even tell the Rd file that it documents an internal function. Best, Uwe Ligges On 18.12.2017 09:01, Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > On 18.12.2017 05:00, Dario Strbenac wrote: >> Good day, >> >> It seems that they are not internal functions if they are have user >> documentation written for them. Internal functions usually don't have >> a help page. > > You can document internal functions, why not? > The definition whether they are internal or not is given in the > NAMESPACE file. > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > >> -------------------------------------- >> Dario Strbenac >> University of Sydney >> Camperdown NSW 2050 >> Australia >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
