No word from the maintainers. I submitted a revised version of the package just now (with an updated date in DESCRIPTION). If someone could look at it in the next few days I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Steven Scott <steve.the.bayes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Dirk. IMO the package is in good shape otherwise. I'll wait hear > from the CRAN maintainers. > S > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > >> >> On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote: >> | These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or std::function in >> the >> | STL implementation of the host machine. If I'm reading that wrong >> someone >> | please let me know. >> >> AFAICT it needs C++11 explicitly set which that machine (with a new >> clang-6.0 >> installation) did not provide by default. This has bitten a few other >> compilations lately as well but should get sorted out in due course. >> >> Dirk >> >> -- >> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
