I think that the current behaviour is documented in WRE:
"...There are two other forms of optional argument specified as \link[pkg]{foo}
and
\link[pkg:bar]{foo} to link to the package pkg, to files foo.html and bar.html
respectively.
These are rarely needed, perhaps to refer to not-yet-installed packages (but
there the HTML
help system will resolve the link at run time) or in the normally undesirable
event that more
than one package offers help on a topic7 (in which case the present package has
precedence so
this is only needed to refer to other packages). They are currently only used
in HTML help
(and ignored for hyperlinks in LATEX conversions of help pages), and link to
the file rather
than the topic (since there is no way to know which topics are in which files
in an uninstalled
package) ... Because they have been frequently misused, the HTML help system
looks for topic foo in package pkg
if it does not find file foo.html."
Unless I am missing something, it seems that it would be relatively painless to
reverse the logic of the current behaviour of the help system,
i.e. to start looking first for the topic and then for a file.
Georgi Boshnakov
-----Original Message-----
From: R-package-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
Gábor Csárdi
Sent: 16 June 2020 13:44
To: Duncan Murdoch <[email protected]>
Cc: List r-package-devel <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] check cross-references error: Non-file
package-anchored link(s)
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:30 PM Duncan Murdoch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 15/06/2020 12:05 p.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
> >>>>>> Duncan Murdoch on Sun, 14 Jun 2020 07:28:03 -0400 writes:
> >
> > > I agree with almost everything you wrote, except one thing: this
> > isn't
> > > newly enforced, it has been enforced since the help system began.
> > What
> > > I think is new is that there are now tests for it. Previously those
> > > links just wouldn't work.
> >
> > > Duncan Murdoch
> >
> > Yes, to all... including Duncan's agreement with Gábor.
> >
> > Also, Duncan M earlier did mention that he had wanted to
> > *change* the link-to-file behavior for these cases (when he wrote
> > most of the Rd2html source code) but somehow did not get it.
>
> Actually, I don't think I pushed for this change at the time (or at
> least I didn't push much). I just wish now that I had, because I
> think it will be harder to do it now than it would have been then.
>
> Duncan
I am not entirely sure, but maybe just documenting the current behaviour and
undoing 78674 could work. With some tweaks? E.g.
* updating R-exts to say that \link[pkg:topic]{text} will link to `topic.html`
in `pkg` first (for historical reasons), and falls back to searching for
`topic` in `pkg` at render time.
* updating Rd2HTML to look for the topic and use it in the link, instead of
throwing a warning, in it cannot find `topic.html`
* removing the `R CMD check` warning for non-file links, that was added in
78674 :)
Is there anything else?
Gabor
[...]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
