On 01.09.2020 09:43, Richel Bilderbeek wrote:
Dear fellow R package maintainers, I would enjoy your advice to clarify a CRAN policy issue. The question is: should a package be able to work, when calling its exported functions using the scope operator? Or, in the example code below, should #1 work? ``` # 1. Scope operator: should this always work? mypackage::myfunction() # Possible error message: # Error in myfunction() : # object 'myhiddenfunction' of mode 'function' was not found
Yes.
# 2. Calling library first library(mypackage) myfunction() ```
Yes.
I feel the answer is 'yes, #1 should work', as I feel this is only indirectly a CRAN repository policy [1] , the IMHO relevant one which I quote: 'Packages should not modify the global environment (user’s workspace).'. This means that if I have a function that calls `mypackage::myfunction`, it will call `library`:
No, it can import from the namespace, i.e. it loads the package, but does not modify the search path (i.e. does not attach the package).
Also note the workspace (=.GlobalEnv) is not the search path. Best, Uwe Ligges
``` #' Function in another package, that depends on my package do_something <- function() { library(mypackage) myfunction() } ``` So, should a package be able to work, when calling its exported functions using the scope operator? Thanks for your advice/pointers, Richel Bilderbeek * [1] <https://mirror.las.iastate.edu/CRAN/web/packages/policies.html> ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel