The CRAN (pretest) email states: package ordPens_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the following pre-tests: Debian: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log>> Status: 2 NOTEs
Last released version's CRAN status: NOTE: 13 See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform. If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all to this message and explain. I really don’t understand how else to fix (and what to fix). These are out of date problems of version 0.3-1, which are not relevant any more in version 1.0.0 Version 1.0.0 exactly was a fix to those. Do you think I can reply-all & explain that this must be a false-positive? Best Aisouda > Am 17.08.2021 um 15:22 schrieb Georgi Boshnakov > <georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk>: > > When the previous version has problems, you get an email listing them, > followed with something like 'Did you fix them? Please Reply-All...' > > Maybe you missed the last phrase? > > Georgi Boshnakov > > > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on behalf of > Aisouda Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:59:13 PM > To: r-package-devel@r-project.org <r-package-devel@r-project.org> > Subject: [R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version > out of date (?) > > Hi, > > submitting an update of our package ordPens failed (update version is 1.0.0), > reporting the following: > Version: 1.0.0 > ok > Version: 0.3-1 > Check: R code for possible problems, Result: NOTE > genRidge: no visible global function definition for 'plogis' > ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'anova' > ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'lm' > ordSelect: no visible binding for global variable 'sd' > ordSmooth: no visible binding for global variable 'sd' > plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'grey' > plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'devAskNewPage' > plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'lines' > predict.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'plogis' > Undefined global functions or variables: > anova devAskNewPage grey lines lm plogis sd > Consider adding > importFrom("grDevices", "devAskNewPage", "grey") > importFrom("graphics", "lines") > importFrom("stats", "anova", "lm", "plogis", "sd") > to your NAMESPACE file. > Version: 0.3-1 > Check: package dependencies, Result: NOTE > Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘IsoGene’ > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html > <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> > <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html > <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>> > > https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ > > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/> > > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ > > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>> > > But these are exactly the new changes that we already took care of in the > updated version 1.0.0 > The previous version 0.3-1 is from 2015 and due to R updates, the old package > won’t work any more. > That is exactly the reason for update version 1.0.0, were everything is fixed > now. > > Also, > - there is a NOTE about change in maintainer, which is already stated in the > cran-comments.md, and the previous maintainer sent an e-main to CRAN as well > - there is a NOTE saying 'Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > > 10s‘ > which is also stated in the cran-comments.md explaining that cross-validation > examples are important for illustrating the package usage. > > > So is this a false positive? > > Best > Aisouda > > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
