On 16.12.2021 15:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
Am 16.12.21 um 15:06 schrieb Hiroaki Yutani:
Hi,
My package is failing on CRAN check on r-devel-windows-x86_64-new-UL.
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_string2path.html
It seems the problem is that there is no available font that meets the
condition in the following code. Is it irrational to assume at least
one TrueType or OpenType font is installed in the system?
available_fonts <- systemfonts::system_fonts()$path
# string2path supports only TrueType or OpenType formats
ttf_or_otf <- available_fonts[grepl("\\.(ttf|otf)$",
available_fonts)]
The machine that is running " r-devel-windows-x86_64-new-UL" is a
freshly installed Windows Server 2022 with GUI. The standard fonts are
available, but no extra fonts isntalled.
To confirm:
> table(gsub(".*\\.(.{3})$", "\\1", dir("c:/WIndows/fonts")))
dat fon ini ttc ttf xml
1 192 1 16 127 1
So there are 127 *.ttf files installed, but systemfonts::system_fonts()
does not find any of these.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
This would be an empty character vector on my Alpine Linux server as
well. The system_fonts() there only contain ".pcf.gz" files from
"/usr/share/fonts/misc/".
Note that the "systemfonts" package on which you rely currently also
fails on that CRAN check flavour for a similar reason
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_systemfonts.html).
On my Alpine Linux system, from example("register_font",
package="systemfonts"):
fonts <- system_fonts()
plain <- sample(which(!fonts$italic & fonts$weight <= 'normal'), 1)
bold <- sample(which(!fonts$italic & fonts$weight > 'normal'), 1)
italic <- sample(which(fonts$italic & fonts$weight <= 'normal'), 1)
## Error in sample.int(length(x), size, replace, prob) :
## invalid first argument
(as there are no italic fonts).
HTH,
Sebastian Meyer
I'm wondering if I need to release a new version to avoid this test
failure. Note that, the other Windows r-devel machine
(r-devel-windows-x86_64-new-TK) doesn't fail. So, it might be just
that something is wrong with r-devel-windows-x86_64-new-UL.
Any suggestions?
Best,
Hiroaki Yutani
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
