Thanks so much for the quick response. It answered everything! It was my mistake that I didn't consider these types of installations. I'll fix my package as soon as I can.
Best, Yutani 2023年7月10日(月) 17:51 Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch>: > >>>>> Hiroaki Yutani > >>>>> on Mon, 10 Jul 2023 17:24:37 +0900 writes: > > [...............] > > Short answer to your questsion (from the 'Subject') is : NO ! > For an example, see below: > > > libR-sys assumes the path to R's shared libraries is > > `${R_HOME}/lib` on Unix-alike platforms. > > In some configurations, R does not need *any* shared libraries, > and there, $R_HOME/lib does *not* exist. > > E.g., I have one of my R-devel versions installed (on Fedora > Linux) with > > ../R/configure --with-blas=-lflexiblas > > using the nice, currently Fedora/Redhat-only "flexiblas" > approach, with which I can nicely switch the versions of BLAS > and Lapack libraries that R works with from within R. > > As that version of R is not "shared", i.e., no libR.so , *and* > gets both its BLAS and Lapack libraries from "external" (not > from R), there's no need for a ./lib/ and so none is created. > > Martin Maechler > ETH Zurich and R Core Team > > > > Is it possible > > that this path doesn't exist on the MKL server? > > > Actually, it compiles fine on the other Linux platforms, > > so I'm wondering what's different there from the other > > servers. > > > > Best, Yutani > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel